Masciarelli v. J.D. Aiken Co.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Romika-USA, Inc. v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Genet Co. v. Annheuser-Busch, Inc., 498 So.2d 683, 684 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)(stating that “a cause of action for tortious interference does not exist against one who is himself a party to the business relationship allegedly interfered with”); see also Salit v. Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., 742 So.2d 381, 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)(stating with respect to a cause of action for tortious interference with a business relationship that “[f]or the interference to be unjustified, the interfering defendant must be a third party, a stranger to the business relationship”); O.E. Smith’s Sons, Inc. v. George, 545 So.2d 298, 299 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)(citing Sloan v. Sax, 505 So.2d 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and Muller v. Stromberg Carlson Corp., 427 So.2d 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.