Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Moore v. State

Moore v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 29, 2000 · Levy, Schwartz, Sorondo
770 So. 2d 1291; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15429; 2000 WL 1745049 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Moore v. State

Opinion of the Court

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Charles Moore challenges the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief upon the grounds that the motion was untimely. The state properly concedes that the motion was timely filed within two years of the date of the mandate in his direct appeal. See Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 1990). Accordingly, the denial of the *1292motion is reversed and remanded for consideration of the merits of Moore’s claim.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑