Smith v. State
Smith v. State
771 So. 2d 6; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11069; 2000 WL 1227858
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the judgment and sentence. Because no objection was made to the sentence, the claim of error is not cognizable on appeal. Cf Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2000). However, we direct the trial court on remand to set a hearing on Smith’s claim that he was sentenced erroneously as a result of ineffective assistance of counsel.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.