Heatly v. State
Heatly v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant challenges the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.
Appellant raised four claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We briefly address only the first claim. In light of the evidence produced at trial to establish Appellant’s identity as the armed robber, Appellant has failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s allegedly
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.