In July 1998 Mr. Stuart appealed to this court sentences in two cases. They were Circuit Court Case No. 97-17927: twenty years’ incarceration followed by fifteen years’ probation for robbery1; and Circuit Court Case No. 97-20100: ten years’ probation for two counts of vehicular homicide,2 to run concurrently with the probation for the robbery conviction. Mr. Stuart had pleaded guilty to these charges but appealed without reserving an issue as dispositive, and without filing a motion to correct an unlawful sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). We dismissed his appeal and cited Leonard v. State, 731 So.2d 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) as controlling authority. See Stuart v. State, No. 98-02900 (Fla. 2d DCA June 2, 1999). Our decision in Leonard, which is legally indistinguishable from Mr. Stuart’s case, was reversed. See Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114 (Fla. 2000). Mr. Stuart had sought further review in the supreme court and, based on the re*1193versal in Leonard, the supreme court also reversed Mr. Stuart’s case for proceedings consistent with Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2000). See Stuart v. State, 768 So.2d 319 (Fla. 2000). Now on remand, the case is before us for review on the merits.

The State has candidly conceded the illegality of the two sentences Mr. Stuart received. Therefore, in accordance with the supreme court’s opinions in Leonard and Maddox, and the mandate in Stuart, we reverse the two sentences Mr. Stuart complains of and remand the cases to the trial court for imposition of sentences within the statutory máximums.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.