Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Perez v. State

Perez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 29, 2000 · Gersten, Green, Schwartz
771 So. 2d 1285; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15437; 2000 WL 1745045 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Perez v. State

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon the holding that the statements made by the trial judge provide a well founded fear that the defendant would not receive a unbiased subsequent hearing, we conclude that the motion to disqualify him was erroneously denied. See Gonzalez v. Goldstein, 633 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Michaud-Berger v. Hurley, 607 So.2d 441 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review denied, 614 So.2d 503 (Fla. 1993); Lamendola v. Grossman, 439 So.2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The application for a writ of prohibition precluding his further participation in the cause is granted.

Prohibition granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.