Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Jones v. Seabury & Smith, Inc.

Jones v. Seabury & Smith, Inc.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 22, 2000 · Allen, Benton, Browning
773 So. 2d 659; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16837; 2000 WL 1867525 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Jones v. Seabury & Smith, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellee’s, Teshia Jones, motion for summary judgment is not a request for affirmative relief; it could not *660have been maintained independently of the appellant’s cause of action. See Heineken v. Heineken, 683 So.2d 194, 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Therefore, this order is not renewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv).

ALLEN, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑