Belhomme v. Bertrand

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Belhomme v. Bertrand, 774 So. 2d 760 (2000)
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15193; 2000 WL 1728265
Goderich, Nesbitt, Sorondo

Belhomme v. Bertrand

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because the plaintiff met her burden of showing the essential elements necessary for the issuance of a temporary injunction, namely, “a clear legal right or interest in the subject matter of the suit, the likelihood of irreparable harm because of the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, and a substantial likelihood of success of the merits,” Oxford Int’l Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54, 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we affirm the trial court’s order.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Anilus BELHOMME v. Gisleine BERTRAND
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published