Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Paschal v. State

Paschal v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 6, 2000 · Cope, Shevin, Sorondo
774 So. 2d 775; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15937; 2000 WL 1781082 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Paschal v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Carl T. Paschal does not exceed the legal maximum, see § 813.011, Fla. Stat. (1965), and therefore his motion to correct illegal sentence is denied. Defendant’s challenge to the factual basis underlying his conviction is one which must be brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and as such, is time-barred. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.