Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 3, 2000 · Altenbernd, Casanueva, Davis
775 So. 2d 366; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14079; 2000 WL 1644336 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Richardson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Richardson appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s order denying the motion as untimely because it was not filed within two years of the issuance of this court’s mandate in Richardson’s direct appeal. See Beaty v. State, 701 So.2d 856 (Fla. 1997). This affirmance is, however, without prejudice to Richardson filing a motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.