Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Rogers v. State

Rogers v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 29, 2000 · Ervin, Padovano, Wolf
775 So. 2d 1002; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16956; 2000 WL 1880154 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rogers v. State

Concurring Opinion

WOLF, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur only because I am required to do so because of Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse this case in part and remand with instructions for the trial court to reconsider its retention of jurisdiction in light of this Court’s opinion in Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We affirm the caáe in all other respects.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ„ concur. WOLF, J., Specially concurs with opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑