Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Friedman v. Pope

Friedman v. Pope
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 27, 2000 · Blue, Campbell, Green
777 So. 2d 1018; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16851; 2000 WL 1873003 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Friedman v. Pope

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. This denial is without prejudice to petitioner objecting to follow-up deposition questions which seek information protected by the work product as defined in Southern Bell Telephone & Telgraph Co. v. Deason, 632 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 1994), and *1019section 766.106(5), Florida Statutes (1999). Follow-up deposition questions regarding matters that occurred after the notice of intent to initiate litigation was served do not, based on this fact alone, constitute work product.

Petition denied.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and GREEN, JJ., Concur. '

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.