Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Ramos v. State

Ramos v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 21, 2000 · Blue, Casanueva, Parker
779 So. 2d 384; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7540; 2000 WL 784040 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Ramos v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sole contention is that the 1995 sentencing guidelines, under which he was sentenced for crimes occurring on March 11, 1997, are unconstitutional because the legislature’s enactment of chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, violated the single-subject provision of Article III, Section 6, of the Florida Constitution. We agree and remand for reconsideration of sentence in accordance with Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000), and our *385recent opinion in Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE and CASANUEVA, JJ, Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.