Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2000

Patterson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 22, 2000 · Goderich, Jorgenson, Ramirez

784 So. 2d 451; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3389; 2000 WL 293675 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Dunbar v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
LaFerte-Diaz v. Department of Corrections (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Barrington Patterson appeals from the trial court’s denial of his 3.800 motion. We affirm the denial of the motion finding that the issues raised lack merit. With regard *452to the issue of whether the Department of Corrections has properly credited Patterson with 392 days credit for time served in accordance with the trial court’s order, we note that the defendant must first exhaust the administrative remedies provided by the Department of Corrections. Bennett v. State, 732 So.2d 1130, 1131 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to Patterson re-raising this issue once he has exhausted the administrative remedies provided by the Department of Corrections.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.