Horn v. State
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Calvin Essix v. the State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
- Nathaniel Daily v. The State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
- Brian M. Rankin v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
- Rankin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
- Gibson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
- Cooper v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
- LaFleur v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
- Lopez v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
- Peoples v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Roosevelt HORN, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Roosevelt Horn, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Margaret Brenan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Roosevelt Horn appeals an order denying his motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Defendant-appellant Horn contends that there is an incorrect calculation in his sentencing guidelines scoresheet. We need not address that claim because defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender and the guidelines scoresheet is irrelevant. See § 775.084(4)(g), Fla.Stat. (1995); McKnight v. State, 773 So.2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Defendant argues that his ten-year sentences exceed the legal maximum, but that is not so. Ten years is the legal maximum for a habitualized third degree felony. § 775.084(4)(a)3., Fla.Stat. (1995).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.