Moore v. Wilson
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bueno v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
- McCord v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
- Florida Department of Corrections v. Watts (Fla. 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Michael W. MOORE, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections, Petitioner,
v.
Samuel WILSON (DC# 190180), Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Terri Leon-Benner (Tallahassee), Assistant General Counsel, for petitioner.
Levine & Finger and Jay L. Levine, Miami, for respondent.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and LEVY, JJ.
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
As the respondent has agreed by confessing error, the trial court order under review, which ordered the Department of Corrections to administer particular medical treatment to a confined prisoner, is quashed for lack of jurisdiction. See Moore v. Peavey, 729 So.2d 494, 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)("The authority of the criminal court to issue orders concerning the conditions and treatment of incarcerated inmates ceases when DOC receives the inmate into custody...."); Singletary v. Acosta, 659 So.2d 449, 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)(trial court "wholly lacks authority to regulate the treatment and placement of a sentenced defendant in the prison system"); see also Singletary v. Duggins, 724 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Certiorari granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.