Martin v. Krischer
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Leichty v. CLERK OF CIR. COURT, LAKE COUNTY (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Anthony R. MARTIN, Petitioner,
v.
Barry KRISCHER, State Attorney, Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, Edward Bieluch, Sheriff, et al., Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Anthony R. Martin, West Palm Beach, pro se.
No response required for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed to the extent that it requests this court to order the sheriff to provide jail credit. Jurisdiction to consider such a claim lies with the trial court. See, e.g., Taylor v. State, 677 So.2d 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). To the extent that the petitioner claims that the sheriff has not complied with his public records request, the petition is dismissed both because no filing fee has been paid, see Martin v. Marko, 651 So.2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and because jurisdiction does not lie in this court in any event. See § 119.11, Fla.Stat. (2000); see also Weeks v. Golden, 764 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). As to the remaining respondents, the petition is dismissed because it states no ground for relief against them.
WARNER, C.J., POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.