Wright v. State
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Russell v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
- Austin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
- Green v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
- Tucker v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Louie T. WRIGHT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A Daniels, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Louie Wright was convicted of dealing in stolen property. At trial, the jury was instructed that "[p]ossession of recently stolen property unless satisfactorily explained gives rise to an inference that the person in possession of the property knew or should have known that the property had been stolen." As Appellant concedes, the issue we certified to the supreme court in Weddell v. State, 780 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), is not preserved in this case.
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.