Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Janson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 19, 2001 · Harris, Sawaya, Thompson

775 So. 2d 434; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 355; 2001 WL 43068 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Nguyen v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, J.

The issue here is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant an extension of time to file a motion for rehearing after the ruling on Janson’s Rule 3.850 motion because “motions for rehearing are not permitted” on motions for postconviction relief. We reverse. See Rule 3.850(g), Fla. R.Crim. P. (granting a fifteen-day period for the filing of a motion for rehearing “of any order denying a motion under this rule”); See also Sanders v. State, 611 So.2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON, C.J., and SAWAYA, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.