Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

C.A.M. v. State

C.A.M. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 7, 2001 · Fletcher, Levy, Ramirez
776 So. 2d 1091; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1080; 2001 WL 118906 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

C.A.M. v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ., concur.

Dissenting Opinion

RAMIREZ, J.,

dissenting.

I dissent because the state offered no evidence in its case-in-chief that on the day the defendant was arrested for trespassing he was not “authorized, licensed, or invited” to be on the premises. See § 810.09(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999); Seago v. State, 768 So.2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑