Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Tobin v. Sunshine State Insurance

Tobin v. Sunshine State Insurance
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 21, 2001 · Goderich, Nesbitt, Sorondo
777 So. 2d 1207; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1819; 2001 WL 166834 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Tobin v. Sunshine State Insurance

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because the insurance company did not actively participate in the lawsuit or take any action inconsistent with its contractual right to appraisal, we affirm the trial court’s order granting the motion to stay proceedings and compel appraisal. See Gonzalez v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 25 Fla. L. Weekly D2614, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 1671415 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Hill v. Ray Carter Auto Sales, Inc., 745 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); ARI Mutual Ins. Co. v. Hogen, 734 So.2d 574 (Fla. *12083d DCA 1999); Gray Mart, Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 703 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Lapidus v. Arlen Beach Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 394 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Further, we find that the remaining issue raised by the insureds lacks merit.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.