Hopper v. Reno
Hopper v. Reno
778 So. 2d 1065; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2153; 2001 WL 195063
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hopper v. Reno
Opinion of the Court
As the jury found the accident at issue was not a legal cause of appellant’s injury, the error, if any, in the jury instructions regarding the amount of damages was harmless. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999). The denial of the motion to amend to allege property damages is also harmless because the property damages had already been paid. See id.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.