Bob Dance Jeep Eagle, Inc. v. Daimlerchrysler Motors Corp.
Bob Dance Jeep Eagle, Inc. v. Daimlerchrysler Motors Corp.
Opinion of the Court
DENIED. The petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied because there is an insufficient showing of an absence of an adequate remedy on appeal.
Concurring Opinion
concurring.
The order denying the parties’ joint motion for a continuance may have been in error. Nevertheless, it is too speculative to expect that respondents would invest and potentially lose “millions of dollars” in building a new dealership while any ruling in respondents’ favor for a new dealership was on appeal and subject to reversal. Boca Raton Artificial Kidney Center, Inc. v. Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, et al., 475 So.2d 260, 261 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)(applicant “assumes the risk” if it builds a facility prior to completion of the process). Without the construction of the dealership, there is no harm to the petitioners.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.