Narvaez v. Pestana
Narvaez v. Pestana
780 So. 2d 267; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2120; 2001 WL 194929
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Narvaez v. Pestana
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. By itself, a landlord’s right to enter the premises and make repairs under a lease does not constitute control of the premises só as to impose on the landlord a duty to protect a tenant’s patrons from the criminal or even negligent acts of third parties on the premises. An owner is not responsible for injuries to persons caused solely by the lessee’s operations and activities. Cf. Craig v. Gate Maritime Properties, Inc., 631 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
We find no error in the points raised on appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.