Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Daniels v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 4, 2001 · Gunther, Shahood, Stone

780 So. 2d 1042; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4343; 2001 WL 321936 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Perez v. Dept. of Corrections (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2002)
Gray v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw the per curiam affirmance previously entered in this case, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

Appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed. The issues raised in this appeal challenging the constitutionality of the Criminal Punishment, Code have been addressed and rejected by this *1043court. See Peterson v. State, 775 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Kendrick v. State, 769 So.2d 428 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Seward v. State, 768 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). As to the other issues raised in this appeal, we find them to be without merit.

We deny appellant’s motion to certify question of great public importance.

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.