Becklum v. State
Becklum v. State
781 So. 2d 430; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1366; 2001 WL 121179
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s order denying the motion to correct illegal sentence, without prejudice to Becklum filing a sufficient motion that he is entitled to be resen-tenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). Upon such filing, to deny relief the trial court must attach all documents necessary to support that conclusion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.