Becklum v. State
Becklum v. State
781 So. 2d 430; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1366; 2001 WL 121179
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Becklum v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s order denying the motion to correct illegal sentence, without prejudice to Becklum filing a sufficient motion that he is entitled to be resen-tenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). Upon such filing, to deny relief the trial court must attach all documents necessary to support that conclusion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.