Wesbert v. State
Wesbert v. State
782 So. 2d 545; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5180; 2001 WL 388026
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wesbert v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s decision revoking defendant’s probation. However, as the State acknowledges, the trial court’s written Order of Probation Violation does not conform to the oral pronouncements made by the trial judge at the time that the probation was revoked. Accordingly, while we affirm the revocation of probation, we remand the cause to the trial court with directions to enter an Order of Revocation that conforms to the' trial judge’s oral pronouncements. See Suarez v. State, 761 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.