Hippolyte v. State
Hippolyte v. State
782 So. 2d 941; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4037; 2001 WL 313871
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hippolyte v. State
Opinion of the Court
We accept the state’s concession that it was error to enter equal concurrent sentences under both the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act and the habitual felony offender statutes. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla. 2000). We therefore strike the habitual offender designa
Conviction affirmed; prison releasee reoffender sentence affirmed; habitual offender designation stricken.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.