Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Wright v. State

Wright v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 25, 2001 · Hazouri, Klein, Stone
782 So. 2d 1007; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5510; 2001 WL 417286 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wright v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant, Linda Wright’s, sentences imposed upon her as a habitual felony offender and a prison releasee reof-fender. The trial court, however, orally sentenced appellant on Count I, robbery with a weapon, to life in prison as a habitual felony offender with a mandatory minimum of thirty years as a prison releasee reoffender. The written sentence imposed upon appellant was the reverse, thirty years as a habitual felony offender and life as a prison releasee reoffender which is not authorized1 and does not comport with the oral sentence imposed. As the oral sentence controls, we remand for the correction of the written sentence on Count I to comport with the oral sentence imposed by the trial court. See, e.g., Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924, 926 n. 1 (Fla. 2000).

AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF WRITTEN SENTENCE.

STONE, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

. See § 775.082(8)(c), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.