Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Hartage v. State

Hartage v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 2, 2001 · Klein, Polen, Stevenson
785 So. 2d 636; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5812; 2001 WL 456508 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hartage v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to refile a legally sufficient motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (explaining that “[t]he allegations required by [State v.] Mancino[, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1988)] at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates entitlement to relief.”).

POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.