Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Dixson v. State

Dixson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 30, 2001 · Fletcher, Levy, Ramirez
785 So. 2d 744; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485; 2001 WL 579832 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dixson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rhodes v. State, 701 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(Neither defense attorney nor trial court is required to warn defendant of sentence-enhancing consequences that defendant’s plea will have as to any future crimes defendant may commit; neither trial court nor defense counsel has duty to anticipate defendant’s recidivism.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.