Pippins v. State
Pippins v. State
787 So. 2d 34; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1326; 2001 WL 120152
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Pippins v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court’s order denying Johnnie Pippins’ motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed. Rule 3.800(a) is not the proper vehicle for Pippins to challenge the legality of his sentence based upon his assertion that the record shows no firearm was entered into evidence. See State v. Mancino, 705 So.2d 1379 (Fla. 1998). This affir-mance, however, is without prejudice to Pippins’ raising the same claim in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, provided, of course, that
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.