Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Boyd v. State

Boyd v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 4, 2001 · Altenbernd, Casanueva, Danahy
787 So. 2d 162; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5894; 2001 WL 468136 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Boyd v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Billy Boyd appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court properly concluded that the motion was untimely because it was filed more than two years after this court issued its mandate. See Beaty v. State, 701 So.2d 856 (Fla. 1997). Thus, we affirm the trial court.

On the other hand, this court accepted Mr. Boyd’s motion for rehearing and entered an order denying his motion well after we issued mandate. He filed his postconviction motion within two years of that order. Although we should not have accepted and ruled upon his motion, having done so it is obvious that we misled him as to the time within which to file his motion. Accordingly, Mr. Boyd shall be authorized to file a motion for postconviction relief, which shall not be deemed untimely so long as it is filed within thirty days of the issuance of our mandate in this case.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and DANAHY, (Senior) Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.