Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Smith v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 17, 2001 · Barfield, Davis, Lewis

789 So. 2d 521; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9733; 2001 WL 799609 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Lutz v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of one count of grand theft and one count of dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme. Section 812.025, Florida Statutes (1999), prohibits an individual from being *522convicted of both grand theft and dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction for dealing in stolen property, but vacate the conviction for grand theft and remand for correction to the sentence to reflect that the grand theft conviction is vacated. See Golden v. State, 688 So.2d 419 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We affirm on all other issues on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.