Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Pirant v. State

Pirant v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 25, 2001 · Altenbernd, Danahy, Paul, Salcines
790 So. 2d 1187; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10278; 2001 WL 830056 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pirant v. State

Opinion of the Court

SALCINES, Judge.

Robert Pirant appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine with intent to sell and possession of cannabis. Trial counsel failed to preserve for appellate review the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress and the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. Therefore, we do not decide the merit of these issues. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76-77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑