Barnett v. State
Barnett v. State
790 So. 2d 1191; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10629; 2001 WL 844741
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Barnett v. State
Opinion of the Court
David Barnett filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his form motion, Barnett argued that he was entitled to additional jail credit in this case. We affirm the trial court’s order denying relief without prejudice to any right Barnett might have to file a facially sufficient motion to correct illegal sentence that argues sufficient facts indicating that the jail credit error in this case is reviewable from the face of the record. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.