Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 15, 2001 · Blue, Fulmer, Green
792 So. 2d 600; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430; 2001 WL 912874 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rodriguez v. State

Opinion of the Court

BLUE, Chief Judge.

Mario Lira Rodriguez appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Rodriguez made a facially sufficient claim that his plea was involuntary based on Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). The trial court denied the motion as untimely because it was filed more than two years after Rodriguez’s conviction became final on direct appeal. In so doing, the *601trial court apparently overlooked this court’s decision in Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), which held that a defendant shall have two years from the issuance of the supreme court’s opinion in Heggs to file a rule 3.850 motion challenging his or her plea on that basis. Rodriguez’s motion was thus timely. We therefore reverse and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

FULMER and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.