Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Vaval v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 29, 2001 · Goderich, Jorgenson, Sorondo

792 So. 2d 649; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12137; 2001 WL 984491 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Curiel v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. See Saldana v. State, 786 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“Advising a defendant that he or she is under investigation is not the same thing as being threatened with deportation.”); see also Kindelan v. State, 786 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Rodriguez v. State, 789 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to defendant refiling his 3.850 motion should the investigation lead to the threat of deportation.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.