Garcia v. State
Garcia v. State
Opinion of the Court
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Upon the state’s proper confession of error, we reverse the denial of Enrique Garcia’s rule 3.800 motion for post conviction relief as to the habitual violent offender sentences imposed upon him for life felony convictions stemming from offenses committed before October 1, 1995. See Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla. 1992); Omound v. State, 743 So.2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
On remand, Garcia is to be re-sentenced on count three (kidnaping with a weapon) in case number 94-39224A, and count four (kidnaping with a weapon) in case number 94-39225. The balance of the order denying defendant’s rule 3.800(a) motion is affirmed.
Accordingly, we affirm the order in part, reverse in part and remand with instructions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.