Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Crisanto v. Raybon

Crisanto v. Raybon
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 24, 2001 · Browning, Polston, Webster
798 So. 2d 11; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13390; 2001 WL 1111518 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Crisanto v. Raybon

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Order Denying Motion to Vacate Order of Modification because the findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence and we cannot say that the holding constitutes an abuse of discretion. Appellant also complains about the trial court’s failure to rule on her request for attorney’s fees and costs. Appellee concedes error. On remand, the trial court shall rule on appellant’s request for attorney’s fees and costs.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.