Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Price v. State

Price v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 17, 2001 · Farmer, Stevenson, Taylor
798 So. 2d 49; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14702; 2001 WL 1230929 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Price v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order summarily denying Appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, which sought to increase the credit for jail time served, is affirmed without prejudice to Appellant’s seeking additional credit by filing a properly pleaded rule 3.800(a) motion that alleges where in the record the information can be located and explains how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested. See Skullestad v. State, 790 So.2d 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Appellant is out of time for filing a rule 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

FARMER, STEVENSON, TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.