Creekmore v. State
Creekmore v. State
798 So. 2d 776; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11920; 2001 WL 957393
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Creekmore v. State
Opinion of the Court
Johnny Creekmore appeals his convictions for manufacture and possession of cannabis and possession of drug paraphernalia. Trial counsel failed to preserve for appellate review the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence; therefore, we do not decide the merit of this issue. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.