Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Salmon v. State

Salmon v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 31, 2001 · Ramirez, Schwartz, Sorondo
798 So. 2d 828; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15235; 2001 WL 1335122 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Salmon v. State

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, AND OR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.