Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Snow v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 31, 2001 · Fletcher, Ramirez, Schwartz

800 So. 2d 307; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15257; 2001 WL 1334755 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Snow v. Crosby (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Travis Anton Snow appeals his conviction for second-degree murder. We affirm because the admission of testimony regarding bullet casings found at the scene two years after the murder was harmless and the prosecutorial comments were insufficient to deny Snow a fair trial. In this case, there was no testimony about the *308caliber of the gun used to commit the murder, the defense’s objection was sustained, and the bullet casings were never mentioned again. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1139 (Fla. 1986) (error is harmless where there is no possibility that it affected the verdict).

The prosecutor’s comment during closing argument that guns of the same caliber cannot be distinguished by sound does not warrant a new trial. See Lopez v. State, 555 So.2d 1298, 1299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (comments did not deprive appellant of a fair trial nor materially contribute to his conviction).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.