Cunningham v. State
Cunningham v. State
801 So. 2d 967; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16382; 2001 WL 1472677
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cunningham v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. Counsel was not ineffective when failing to present a double jeopardy challenge to appellant’s convictions. State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla. 1991). Similarly, counsel’s performance was neither deficient during defense witness Rod Allen’s testimony, nor during closing arguments.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.