Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Hammond v. Hammond

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 12, 2001 · Barfield, Nortwick, Polston

801 So. 2d 988; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17472; 2001 WL 1580275 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Gaetani-Slade v. Slade (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BARFIELD, J.

The former husband appeals the trial court’s order denying a request for modification of child support and visitation. We find no error in the denial of the petition for modification, and affirm as to that point. In denying the former wife’s motion for attorney’s fees, however, the trial court’s order fails to make proper findings regarding whether each party has the ability to pay his or her own attorney’s fees. Absent such a finding, the denial of fees is erroneous because of the apparent substantial disparity in the income of the parties. Hyatt v. Hyatt, 672 So.2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court should make the proper findings regarding attorney’s fees.

REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.