Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Green v. State

Green v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 30, 2001 · Cobb, Griffin, Sharp
804 So. 2d 474; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17029; 2001 WL 1517039 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Green v. State

Concurring Opinion

SHARP, W.,

concurring specially.

Green has filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking a belated appeal. Because his petition does not allege what counsel failed to do regarding the handling of his appeal, it is legally insufficient under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(3)(F). That rule requires the petition include “the specific acts sworn to by the petitioner or petitioner’s counsel that constitutes the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel or basis for entitlement to belated appeal,” including whether petitioner requested counsel to proceed with the appeal. Additionally, petitioner must allege the request for an appeal was made to counsel in a timely manner. See, e.g., Farnam v. State, 746 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Accordingly, I agree this petition for writ of habeas corpus for a belated appeal should be summarily denied, but without prejudice to file a legally sufficient petition under the rule and appropriate case law.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. SHARP, W., J., concurs specially with opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.