Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2001

Dixon v. State

Dixon v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 28, 2001 · Covington, Edward, Threadgill, Whatley
805 So. 2d 1033; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18512; 2001 WL 1744706 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dixon v. State

Opinion of the Court

WHATLEY, Acting Chief Judge.

Keith Rashad Dixon appeals the dismissal of his motion for reduction or modification of sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). *1034We convert this appeal to a petition for writ of certiorari and grant the petition.

Dixon initially filed a direct appeal from a final judgment and sentence. The case was affirmed on June 1, 2001. Dixon v. State, 790 So.2d 414, (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (table). The mandate was issued on June 26, 2001. Dixon then filed a timely rule 3.800(c) motion on July 26, 2001. The trial court dismissed the 3.800(c) motion because the court mistakenly believed that the mandate had not yet been issued. Since the mandate had been issued, the trial court had jurisdiction to hear the motion, and thus, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by dismissing the motion. See Johnson v. State, 776 So.2d 1026, 1026 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and direct the trial court to rule on the merits of Dixon’s motion for reduction or modification of sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.800(c).

Petition granted.

COVINGTON, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.