Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2002

Cozart v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 2, 2002 · Per Curiam

823 So. 2d 234; 2002 WL 1770703 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

McGee v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Taylor v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Baldwin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Hallman v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Twitty v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Travis v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

823 So.2d 234 (2002)

Adam Joseph COZART, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D02-0607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 2, 2002.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant's revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, we note that the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation. We thus remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, KAHN, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.