Harris v. State
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Towery v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
- McCrea v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
- Rosa v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
- Ruff v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
- Hogan v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
- Walters v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Rudolph HARRIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*1094 Rudolph Harris, Lawtey, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to a negotiated plea, Rudolph Harris was convicted of the lesser-included offense of possession of cocaine and received a four year sentence. In his Rule 3.850[1] motion, he alleges the existence of several errors in his scoresheet. The trial court in its order acknowledges the existence of scoresheet errors but declined to grant any relief because he entered a plea in exchange for a specific term of years.
The trial court ruled correctly. Scoresheet errors are harmless when the sentence is the result of a negotiated plea agreement. See, e.g., Hill v. State, 730 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The transcript reflects that Harris entered his plea in exchange for a four year sentence, not a guidelines sentence. Moreover, as the court points out in its order, he does not seek to withdraw his plea.
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN, PLEUS and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Rule 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. Pro. (1999).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.